In August, San Francisco Board Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi introduced legislation which would ban declawing, except when deemed medically necessary. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed a resolution in 2003 encouraging cat guardians and veterinarians to stop declawing cats, noting that there are humane alternatives, including scratching posts, nail caps, and double-sided tape, which help prevent cats from clawing furniture. Unfortunately, a recent survey reportedly showed that some people just aren’t willing to try the alternatives, and some vets will still perform the procedure whenever someone asks them to.

But, if the ban passes, anyone found guilty of performing, assisting, or ordering the procedure, will face up to six months imprisonment in the county jail and/or a fine of up to $1,000.

West Hollywood, Calif., passed similar legislation banning declawing in 2003. The procedure is also illegal in 25 countries, including the United Kingdom and many European nations.

There is no logical reason why it should not be banned in San Francisco as well. People who care more about their upholstery than animal welfare should not have a cat in the first place--a ban on declawing will hopefully make them realize that they’re better suited to care for a plush toy or a “computerized companion” rather than a living being.

There will always be those who insist that they should be able to do whatever they want to animals. But if people aren’t opposed to laws preventing others from abusing their children, they shouldn’t object to legislation prohibiting people from harming their cats either!

Many people, though, simply just aren’t aware that declawing is inhumane. If a big city like San Francisco bans declawing, it will not only help spare area cats from pain and suffering, it will help educate others around the nation about the cruel procedure.

Tags: cats, declawing, francisco, san

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It's about time.. we're always so slow to protect animals from these types of practices. Maybe it will catch on and other cities will ban it as well.

Reply to This

We can only hope!

Reply to This

This would be great!!! I'll keep my fingers cross!! Thx 4 sharing!

Reply to This

Crossing mine, too! It's about time the "powers that be" in a large American city stepped up to the plate on behalf of animals!!!

Reply to This

RSS

Latest Activity

Jennifer Pendergrass added a discussion to the group Helping Animals
I lost my job in March and have been managing to keep my head above water until recently. My Sheltie, Smokey, got very sick and was put on several medications with vet bills running close to $500. While he is feeling much better, in the process of...
22 minutes ago
This is the place to lobby for animals, speak out against cruelty and discuss the latest news and petitions.
24 minutes ago
1-800-NO-MEOW LMAO Belles too funny I cracked up. Have thought about self cleaners before but was not sure if it would scare them off. The fountians interest me though for drinking water. As for the litter box yes need to connect it to toilet plum...
58 minutes ago
Jennifer Pendergrass, Bryan pratama and Rebecca M. Bennett joined ASPCA Online Community
59 minutes ago
Belles I also free feed, only had an issue with one cat, whom we nicked Hoover, he would inhale any food possible then present it back. I agree cats are individuals as are dogs, some do fine with free feeding others do better with timed feedings.
1 hour ago
Bryan pratama updated their profile
1 hour ago
The animal may be injured to the extent that he'll heal without human intervention. They are *very* tough,
1 hour ago
Misha LaRae I Kinda Feel Alone... Long Story.......
1 hour ago

Badge

Loading…

© 2009   Created by ASPCA

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service