The Lounge

Add a Comment

Comment by Barbara 6 hours ago

Oh, Delilah, you know, of course, that anyone can write a Wikipedia entry, including the person it's about. I'd be willing to bet that Nathan wrote his own entry as many do. As far as his ideas...I hate to break it to you, but they are not his. He knows nothing about these subjects. He merely reposts the ideas of others. In my neck of the woods we call that plagarism. When someone attempts to engage him in debate, he merely name calls and cries conspiracy. It's like arguing with my kid...when he was 2.

Comment by Belles 7 hours ago

Lisbeth, thanks for the update on the dogs.. I meant to comment on your update yesterday and got sidetracked by meaningless arguing! LOL

Your post drives home the point that there are far more important matters. Thanks for keeping us updated.

Comment by Delilah 21 hours ago

And an article about him from 2006: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HMU/is_12_33/ai_n27095588/

Will someone please direct me to his offense?

Comment by Delilah 21 hours ago

I think I missed something about Nathan, I like his ideas. At least he actually has his own ideas and many of them, unlike others we have had issues with. He's mentioned in wikipedia--possibly put himself there but here it is:
Nathan Janes is an American pop artist known for his paintings of dogs which he calls "Pop ARF".[1] Janes has created a number of original designs, which have been used to help support various nonprofit organizations that promote animal welfare. Among these projects, Janes has designed the first official ribbon for animals, the “Animal Guardian Ribbon,” which is being distributed by Rational Animal [1] to help support animal shelters throughout the United States.[2]

Janes' art features vibrant colors and controlled line work and is designed to elicit an emotional response. He hopes that people see his art and remember those bonds that they have felt with animals they have loved.[1]

Comment by Barbara 1 day ago

It's all a conspiracy, Nathan. We're all out to get you, suppress your regurgitation of ideas you didn't think of and prevent the horrors of truly bad art.

Comment by Belles 1 day ago

Okie dokie.. I tried to warn you nicely.

Comment by Nathan Janes 1 day ago

You and your pack of wolves are the ones misbehaving. Are you serious....I just posted a comment with a link and then you attacked me...whatever......you just like to create drama

Comment by Belles 1 day ago

Nathan, this is a privately owned room.. subject to the rules or feelings of the owner and moderators. You've been asked to behave in here.. if you cannot do that, you are violating the rules and will be asked to leave or you will not be welcome here.

That's pretty simple, even for you.

I'm glad you have a fan club, even more reason to go start your own group. I suggest you do that.

Comment by Nathan Janes 1 day ago

So you can share creative information from others, but you can't express you own?? Sounds very repressive and unamerican to me. I would say a small group of you are being rude. I have had many people message me expressing their gratitude for what I do and say how they are afraid of bullies like some of you so they don't comment.
I guess when you suggest a site, you should be reported for spam.

Comment by Barbara on November 23, 2009 at 3:23pm

I reported him, too. Spreading that awful art around is bad enough, but spamming his site is unforgivable.

• First
• Previous
• Next
• Last